14 September – 20 September 2026

The runners who beat the time we predicted for them by the most — measured against the prediction the site was showing on the morning of the race, with the course and the day taken out. Open to the whole field, not just the front of it.

BOYS · UNDERCLASS (Fr/So)

Cayden Abbott Dellamora

Foxcroft Academy · FR
We predicted41:09 ±102s, on 2 races
→
They ran29:55 Central XC meet

14.7% under their prediction. Worth 35:05 once that field's day is taken out — 3.2× the normal week-to-week swing for a runner at that speed.

RunnerPredictedRanUnderScore
2Mattheus ReinhartMaine Coast Waldorf · SO31:1125:0913.0%2.99
3Evan CornishLewiston High School · FR26:5222:1111.2%2.93
4Brooks SmithMaranacook Community High School · FR30:2327:1311.6%2.77
5Zev RitterMaine Coast Waldorf · FR31:1825:3711.7%2.67

Ranked by score, not by the raw percentage — a slower runner has more room to move, so the percentages are not comparable on their own. The explanation below says how that is handled.

297 runners qualified in this category.
BOYS · UPPERCLASS (Jr/Sr)

Brody Waltz

Gardiner High School · SR
We predicted25:24 ±39s, on 3 races
→
They ran21:07 Skowhegan Area High School XC Meet

13.0% under their prediction. Worth 22:06 once that field's day is taken out — 3.6× the normal week-to-week swing for a runner at that speed.

RunnerPredictedRanUnderScore
2Manny InacioBrunswick High School · SR23:5920:387.5%2.75
3Owen CummingsGorham High School · SR18:3216:434.9%2.49
4Milo CardellaMt. Ararat High School · SR39:3832:4111.3%2.47
5Ben GapskiBoothbay/Wiscasset · JR23:4121:146.4%2.46

Ranked by score, not by the raw percentage — a slower runner has more room to move, so the percentages are not comparable on their own. The explanation below says how that is handled.

284 runners qualified in this category.
GIRLS · UNDERCLASS (Fr/So)

Hallie Poussard

Hall-Dale High School · FR
We predicted24:27 ±66s, on 2 races
→
They ran23:04 Winthrop Meet

8.9% under their prediction. Worth 22:17 once that field's day is taken out — 2.9× the normal week-to-week swing for a runner at that speed.

RunnerPredictedRanUnderScore
2Leah BrownLeavitt Area High School · FR37:4231:4811.6%2.54
3Liberty RandOxford Hills Comprehensive High School · FR42:4936:1511.3%2.47
4Audrey RobinsonBoothbay/Wiscasset · SO25:0823:368.2%2.34
5Charlotte WiseMt. Ararat High School · SO35:3930:2810.4%2.27

Ranked by score, not by the raw percentage — a slower runner has more room to move, so the percentages are not comparable on their own. The explanation below says how that is handled.

190 runners qualified in this category.
GIRLS · UPPERCLASS (Jr/Sr)

Isabel LoSacco

Scarborough High School · SR
We predicted30:26 ±52s, on 3 races
→
They ran24:39 SCARBORO-NOBLE-SO PORTLAND@THORNTON ACADEMY

10.9% under their prediction. Worth 27:07 once that field's day is taken out — 2.6× the normal week-to-week swing for a runner at that speed.

RunnerPredictedRanUnderScore
2Jillian LathropSkowhegan Area High School · SR36:2430:5211.2%2.44
3Harper OlmsteadMaranacook Community High School · SR24:4624:036.2%1.90
4Fiona PalazzoBucksport High School · SR24:2021:275.5%1.88
5Lee MaloneyMt. Blue High School · JR33:5330:098.2%1.80

Ranked by score, not by the raw percentage — a slower runner has more room to move, so the percentages are not comparable on their own. The explanation below says how that is handled.

190 runners qualified in this category.
How the award is decided

Every runner on this site carries an index — a projected 5K on a neutral course, worked out from the races they have already run. Index Breakers goes to whoever beat theirs by the most.

The prediction has to pre-date the race

The index here is rebuilt from scratch using only races run strictly before 2026-09-14. It is the number the site was showing on the morning of the race, which is the only number anyone could have been trying to beat. Include the race itself and the model quietly drags the prediction toward what actually happened, and nobody can beat anything.

The course and the day are taken out

If a whole field beats its index by thirty seconds, no model can tell whether the course ran fast or everybody had a good day — those are the same observation. So each runner is measured against the rest of their own field, with themselves left out of that baseline, so a runner who destroys the field cannot flatten their own bar by sitting in the middle of it.

Stated plainly: this measures who outran the day, not who ran fastest. A whole team running out of their minds together will not sweep the list, because they moved the day with them.

Fast and slow runners are compared fairly

A raw percentage sounds fair and is not. Measured across this week's field, the best breaks run about ±2.0% for runners around 18:29 and ±4.6% for runners around 32:12 — slower runners simply have more room to move. Rank on the raw percentage and the award goes to the slowest qualifying runner every single week, by construction.

So each break is divided by how much a runner of that speed typically varies. A 18:29 runner going 3.9% under scores the same as a 32:12 runner going 9.1% under. That is what makes this open to the whole field rather than nominally open to it.

Who qualifies

2 or more races before the window. A runner with one race has no index worth beating — that is most freshmen in early September, and it is right rather than unfortunate: there is no claim to make about someone the model has barely seen. They qualify the moment they have a second race.

What the numbers mean

Built on 3,794 results run before the window and 1,241 run during it, across 32 races. Ratings are estimates with stated uncertainty, not official times or seeds.

Every week